elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Hernandez, Shane

candidate · H0MI10295
Hernandez, Shane MI · REP · House · MI-10 · open-seat
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Hernandez, Shane · every race, every cycle

cycle 20222020
2 cycles1 committees0 contributing committees44 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2022

DEM · primary contest (5 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Arraf, Huwaida challenger 1
Marlinga, Carl J. challenger 23
Powell, Rhonda challenger 1
Rogensues, Angela challenger 3
Yanez, Henry challenger 1

REP · primary contest (5 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Hernandez, Shane (this candidate) open-seat 24
Esshaki, Eric challenger
James, John challenger 363
Marcinkewciz, Tony I challenger
McClain, Lisa incumbent 427

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

MACOMB, MI, 48044

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 54% · PACs 42% · Super PACs 5%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)366$59,735
PACs21$46,800
Super PACs2$5,100
Total (committee-sourced)$111,635

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

8% by dollars

96 of 1166 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 90% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 10%

1166 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 389 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($1,019,666 vs $111,635). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · BROADBRIDGE, KURT

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Shane Hernandez For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2022:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

16 of this candidate's 24 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
American Sugar Cane League Of Usa, Inc Pac 47% / 53%
Florida Sugar Cane League Pac 47% / 53%
American Crystal Sugar Company Political Action Committee 54% / 46%
Michigan Sugar Company Growers Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
Rock Holdings Inc. Pac 45% / 55%
Amalgamated Sugar Company Political Action Committee 43% / 57%
Ford Motor Company Civic Action Fund 41% / 59%
The Council Of Insurance Agents & Brokers Political Action Committee 41% / 59%
American Dental Association Political Action Committee 40% / 60%
National Apartment Association Political Action Committee 38% / 62%
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative Political Action Committee 38% / 62%
National Corn Growers Association Pac (Cornpac) 35% / 65%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2022 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Winred Technical Services, Llc $2,106 210 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Anedot $663 79 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Eventbrite $126 28 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Facebook $13,107 19 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Paypal $225 12 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Anedot $237 9 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Grand River Strategies $36,308 7 001 (Administrative / overhead)
The Strategy Group For Media $128,921 7 006 (Campaign materials)
Strategic Media Placement, Llc $176,086 6 004 (Advertising)
Grindstone Strategies $18,080 5 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Grand Valley Consulting, Llc $5,434 5 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Right Strategies Llc $17,500 5 001 (Administrative / overhead)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)345
001 (Administrative / overhead)51
004 (Advertising)43
006 (Campaign materials)17
007 (Campaign events)4
005 (Polling)4
002 (Travel)2

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..