elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Long, Billy Mr.

candidate · H0MO07113
Long, Billy Mr. MO · REP · Senate · MO · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Long, Billy Mr. · every race, every cycle

9 cycles2 committees1 contributing committees204 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In the 2026 Senate field

MO

117 Senate candidates nationally in 2026.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Ossoff, T. Jonathan GA DEM $214,842,226
2 Sullivan, Dan AK REP $109,507,676
3 Graham, Lindsey O. SC REP $55,788,928
4 Peters, Gary MI DEM $42,624,020
5 McConnell, Mitch KY REP $41,405,744
6 Hickenlooper, John W. CO DEM $40,916,604
7 Daines, Steve MT REP $23,656,650
8 Booker, Cory A. NJ DEM $22,038,180

The national Senate field for 2026, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.

Campaign contact

SPRINGFIELD, MO, 658084527

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 99% · Super PACs 1% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs845$1,462,264
Super PACs5$10,500
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)90$3,276
Total (committee-sourced)$1,476,041

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees2$52,520
Total$52,520

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

3% by dollars

434 of 7648 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 86% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 14%

7648 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 940 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($9,380,650 vs $1,476,041). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · TAYLOR, JERED M

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Billy Long For Senate Principal campaign committee S
Security For America Fund Joint fundraising H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

37 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Amazon.Com Services Llc Separate Segregated Fund (Amazon Pac) 50% / 50%
American College Of Cardiology Pac (Heartpac) 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
American College Of Surgeons Professional Association Pac 49% / 51%
Consumer Technology Association Pac 51% / 49%
Elevance Health, Inc. Political Action Committee (Elevance Health Pac) 51% / 49%
T-Mobile Us, Inc. Political Action Committee (T-Pac) 51% / 49%
Verizon Communications, Inc. Political Action Committee (Verizon Pac) 49% / 51%
Ctia - The Wireless Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
National Association Of Broadcasters Political Action Committee (Nabpac) 48% / 52%
American Society Of Anesthesiologists Political Action Committee (Asa Pac) 47% / 53%
Davita Inc. Political Action Committee (Dapac) 47% / 53%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Winred $3,360 337 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Campaign Solutions $31,893 222 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Anedot $7,856 65 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Npc Dialpay $8,296 32 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Gula Graham Group $292,711 28 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Gm Financial $33,772 26 002 (Travel)
Jared Enterprises $29,305 26 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Elan Financial Services $337,692 26 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Reding, Royce Mr. $115,000 25 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Internal Revenue Service $13,751 25 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Jared Enterprises $43,049 24 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Elan Financial Services $376,992 24 001 (Administrative / overhead)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)924
001 (Administrative / overhead)693
002 (Travel)138
004 (Advertising)57
007 (Campaign events)44
005 (Polling)3
006 (Campaign materials)2

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..