elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Lankford, James Paul Mr.

candidate · H0OK05114
Lankford, James Paul Mr. OK · REP · House · OK-05 · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Lankford, James Paul Mr. · every race, every cycle

9 cycles1 committees0 contributing committees459 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2026

REP · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Lankford, James Paul Mr. (this candidate) challenger 37
Bice, Stephanie incumbent 420

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

EDMOND, OK, 730139415

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 100%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs43$72,750
Total (committee-sourced)$72,750

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees16$68,808
Total$68,808

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

16% by dollars

5071 of 26037 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 100% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 0%

26037 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 43 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($20,811,512 vs $72,750). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · MILLER, TERRI LYNN MRS.

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Families For James Lankford Principal campaign committee S

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

24 of this candidate's 37 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Siemens Corporation Pac 49% / 51%
National Association Of Rehabiliation Providers & Agencies Inc. Political Action Committee 53% / 47%
Williams And Jensen, Pllc Political Action Committee 54% / 46%
Dentons Us Llp Pac 45% / 55%
Tellurian Inc Pac 44% / 56%
Federation Of Exchange Accomodators 1031 Pac 57% / 43%
Lockheed Martin Corporation Employees' Political Action Committee 43% / 57%
U.S. Bancorp Federal Political Action Committee 43% / 57%
American Institute Of Certified Public Accountants Political Action Committee 42% / 58%
Serco Inc. Political Action Committee (Serco Pac) 42% / 58%
Waterpac - National Rural Water Association Political Committee 41% / 59%
Air Line Pilots Association Pac 60% / 40%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Winred Technical Services Llc $47,433 101 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Winred Technical Services Llc $9,813 100 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Fedex $2,108 62 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Arrow Consulting $184,153 44 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Winred Technical Services Llc $2,879 37 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Pearson & Associates $251,231 37 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Gr Pro, Llc $506,851 36 006 (Campaign materials)
Us Postal Service $6,258 36 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Paycom $170,548 35 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Paycom $458,554 34 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Cox Communications $10,491 33 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Fedex $956 32 001 (Administrative / overhead)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)1,896
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)468
002 (Travel)212
004 (Advertising)148
007 (Campaign events)95
006 (Campaign materials)80
011 (Political contributions)2
005 (Polling)2
012 (Donations)1

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..