elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Bartlett, Lisa

candidate · H2CA49267
Bartlett, Lisa CA · REP · House · CA-49 · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Bartlett, Lisa · every race, every cycle

cycle 202620242022
3 cycles1 committees0 contributing committees30 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2026

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Levin, Mike incumbent 188

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Bartlett, Lisa (this candidate) challenger 2

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

DANA POINT, CA, 92629

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 100%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs2$2,000
Total (committee-sourced)$2,000

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

0% by dollars

0 of 878 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 100% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 0%

878 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 2 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($1,225,970 vs $2,000). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · BARTLETT, LISA

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Lisa Bartlett For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

1 of this candidate's 2 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Wsp Usa Inc. Pac 63% / 37%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Campaign Solutions $31,046 43 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Bank Of America $338 14 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Campaign Compliance Group $14,639 10 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Campaign Compliance Group $3,582 6 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Srcp Media $145,955 6 004 (Advertising)
Venture Strategic Inc. $94,207 6 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Connell Donatelli, Inc. $9,750 3 004 (Advertising)
Capitol Tech Solutions $1,771 3 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Cygnal, Ifa Holding Inc. $49,215 3 005 (Polling)
Verde Consulting Group Llc $5,001 3 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Silverstreak Connect Llc $45,000 3 005 (Polling)
Alizieri, Jenniffer Ortiz $5,700 2 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)53
001 (Administrative / overhead)52
004 (Advertising)27
005 (Polling)6
007 (Campaign events)1

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..