elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Inhofe, James M. Sen.

candidate · S4OK00083
Inhofe, James M. Sen. OK · REP · Senate · OK · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Inhofe, James M. Sen. · every race, every cycle

17 cycles5 committees0 contributing committees0 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2026

REP · primary contest (3 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Inhofe, James M. Sen. (this candidate) challenger 345
Mullin, Markwayne incumbent 421
Swearengin, Tammy challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

In the 2026 Senate field

OK

Inhofe, James M. Sen. ranks #35 of 117 Senate candidates nationally in 2026.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Ossoff, T. Jonathan GA DEM $214,842,226
2 Sullivan, Dan AK REP $109,507,676
3 Graham, Lindsey O. SC REP $55,788,928
4 Peters, Gary MI DEM $42,624,020
5 McConnell, Mitch KY REP $41,405,744
6 Hickenlooper, John W. CO DEM $40,916,604
7 Daines, Steve MT REP $23,656,650
8 Booker, Cory A. NJ DEM $22,038,180
35 Inhofe, James M. Sen. (this candidate) OK REP $1,462,973

The national Senate field for 2026, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP.

Campaign contact

OKLAHOMA CITY, OK, 73113

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 86% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 13% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs633$1,248,243
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)7791$191,730
Super PACs1$5,000
Total (committee-sourced)$1,444,973

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

1% by dollars

2420 of 37660 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 94% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 6%

37660 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 8425 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($23,420,748 vs $1,444,973). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · Mike Osburn

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Oklahoma Senate Republican Nominee Fund - Jim Inhofe Authorized committee S
Fund For A Conservative Future II Leadership PAC N
Inhofe Oklahoma Victory 2002 Committee Joint fundraising X
Inhofe Victory Committee; The Joint fundraising Q
Oklahoma Victory Committee Joint fundraising N

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

34 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Iheartmedia Inc. Pac 50% / 50%
Johnson Controls Inc. Pac 50% / 50%
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. Employees Political Action Committee (Hiipac) 49% / 51%
K&L Gates Llp Political Action Committee (Dc) 51% / 49%
Verizon Communications, Inc. Political Action Committee (Verizon Pac) 49% / 51%
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld Llp Civic Action Committee (Aka Akin Gump Pac) 47% / 53%
Cox Enterprises Pac (Coxpac) Inc. 47% / 53%
American Airlines Inc. Political Action Committee (Aapac) 46% / 54%
Employees Of Rtx Corporation Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
Toyota Motor North America, Inc Political Action Committee (Toyota/Lexus Pac) 46% / 54%
At&T Inc. Employee Federal Political Action Committee (At&T Employee Federal Pac) 45% / 55%
Lockheed Martin Corporation Employees' Political Action Committee 43% / 57%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown

No vendor disbursements on file.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..