elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Hawley, Joshua David Sen

candidate · S8MO00160
Hawley, Joshua David Sen MO · REP · Senate · MO · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Hawley, Joshua David Sen · every race, every cycle

5 cycles4 committees24 contributing committees532 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In the 2026 Senate field

MO

117 Senate candidates nationally in 2026.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Ossoff, T. Jonathan GA DEM $214,842,226
2 Sullivan, Dan AK REP $109,507,676
3 Graham, Lindsey O. SC REP $55,788,928
4 Peters, Gary MI DEM $42,624,020
5 McConnell, Mitch KY REP $41,405,744
6 Hickenlooper, John W. CO DEM $40,916,604
7 Daines, Steve MT REP $23,656,650
8 Booker, Cory A. NJ DEM $22,038,180

The national Senate field for 2026, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.

Campaign contact

ST LOUIS, MO, 63131

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 83% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 16% · Super PACs 1% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs869$3,144,759
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)22188$618,164
Super PACs172$39,194
Party committees1$1,894
Total (committee-sourced)$3,804,011

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees55$1,422,632
Total$1,422,632

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

19% by dollars

75459 of 203270 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 90% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 10%

203270 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 23230 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($34,301,606 vs $3,804,011). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · PURPURA, SALVATORE

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Hawley Victory Committee Joint fundraising N
Winsome Leaders I Joint fundraising S
Winsome Leaders II Joint fundraising S
Josh Hawley For Senate Principal campaign committee S

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

13 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Thompson Coburn Political Action Committee 49% / 51%
National Association Of Broadcasters Political Action Committee (Nabpac) 48% / 52%
Florida Sugar Cane League Pac 47% / 53%
American Crystal Sugar Company Political Action Committee 54% / 46%
United Postmasters And Managers Of America Political Fund 55% / 45%
Small Business Investor Alliance Pac 44% / 56%
American Israel Public Affairs Committee Political Action Committee 59% / 41%
Boston Scientific Corporation Political Action Committee (Bsc Pac) 39% / 61%
National Association Of Convenience Stores Political Action Committee 28% / 72%
National Automobile Dealers Association Political Action Committee 27% / 73%
National Association Of Letter Carriers Of U.S.A. Political Fund (Letter Carrier Political Fund) 78% / 22%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
First Bankcard $471,214 203
Anedot $42,878 197
Anedot $23,630 190
Onmessage Inc. $1,271,562 142
First Bankcard $175,956 108
Winred $33,138 104
Winred $77,112 104
Lgm Consulting $642,362 96
Onmessage Inc. $8,633,767 96
Onmessage Digital Fundraising, Llc $1,208,881 91
Olympic Media Llc $266,017 89
Lgm Consulting $11,266 88

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..