elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Onmessage Digital Fundraising

vendor

ANNAPOLIS, MD

001,003

5 committees paid them214 payments

Active cycles: 2024

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
69.5%
82.5%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Captured
one client is a majority of this vendor's revenue
John James For Michigan 69.5%
Electgabeevans.Com 6.0%
Stephen Varela For Colorado 7.1%
Herschel 34 Pac 0.5%
Hung Cao For Virginia 17.0%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
John James For Michigan $325,785 120 2024
Electgabeevans.Com $27,935 15 2024
Stephen Varela For Colorado $33,368 13 2024
Herschel 34 Pac $2,337 4 2024
Hung Cao For Virginia $79,501 4 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Right Rail List Co 6 900.6x
Onmessage Inc 3 510.3x
P2P Messaging 4 232.0x
O2M Digital 5 122.7x
Better Mousetrap Digital 5 94.5x
Tma Direct, Inc. 3 82.3x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.