elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Us Postal Service

vendor

TOPEKA, KS

OTHER,001,003

11 committees paid them615 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2006,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
31.6%
top client · Moran For Kansas
59.3%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Moran For Kansas 31.6%
Moran For Kansas 7.9%
Mann For Congress 19.8%
Moran Victory Committee 25.0%
Moran For Kansas 3.8%
Boyda For Congress 11.9%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Moran For Kansas $2,065 10 2022
Moran For Kansas $514 5 2020
Mann For Congress $1,290 5 2020
Moran Victory Committee $1,632 3 2022
Moran For Kansas $250 2 2018
Boyda For Congress $774 2 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Singularis Group 4 1088.7x
Usps 3 612.4x
Aristotle International, Inc. 3 39.1x
Anedot 3 5.4x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.