elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Chalmers & Adams

vendor

JOHNS CREEK, GA

8 committees paid them15 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
33.2%
top client · Baxter For Congress
65.1%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Baxter For Congress 33.2%
Van De Water For Congress 22.4%
Concerned American Voters 9.5%
Robert Deming For Congress 6.8%
Usa Leadership Fund 11.0%
Usa Leadership Fund 2.4%
No Easy Day Pac 1.0%
Cenedella For Congress 2.4%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Baxter For Congress $8,389 3 2022
Van De Water For Congress $5,669 2 2022
Concerned American Voters $2,402 2 2022
Robert Deming For Congress $1,720 2 2020
Usa Leadership Fund $2,789 2 2022
Usa Leadership Fund $606 1 2024
No Easy Day Pac $255 1 2022
Cenedella For Congress $595 1 2022
Culp For Congress $2,500 1 2022
Cenedella For Congress $340 1 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Pac Management Services 3 125.5x
Anedot 3 3.4x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.