elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Target

vendor

TUCSON, AZ

001,007,101,003

47 committees paid them268 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2006,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
17.9%
top client · Anita For Arizona
52.9%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Anita For Arizona 17.9%
Engel For Arizona 14.2%
Ciscomani For Congress 20.8%
Anita For Arizona 2.4%
Ciscomani For Congress 11.2%
Friends Of Jevin D. Hodge 20.8%
Eddie Speir For Congress 2.2%
Mark Kelly For Senate 0.2%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Anita For Arizona $533 9 2020
Engel For Arizona $423 6 2024
Ciscomani For Congress $622 6 2022
Anita For Arizona $70 4 2018
Ciscomani For Congress $334 2 2024
Friends Of Jevin D. Hodge $622 2 2022
Eddie Speir For Congress $66 2 2024
Mark Kelly For Senate $6 1 2020
Women Speak Out Pac $251 1 2022
Moms Fed Up $59 1 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Super System Strategies 3 1855.7x
Beyond Bread 3 1391.8x
Hotel Congress 4 1237.2x
Quiktrip 3 1113.4x
Culinary Dropout 3 927.9x
The Henry 3 695.9x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.