elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Pg Targeting Llc

vendor

SPICEWOOD, TX

CONSULT,ADVERTISE,OTHER,001

12 committees paid them40 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2018

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
15.6%
top client · Hohman For Congress
71.6%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Hohman For Congress 15.6%
Mark McCloskey For Missouri 18.4%
Cloud For Congress 37.7%
Fight For Mississippi Pac 10.1%
Brad Namdar For Congress 1.1%
Laurie Buckhout For Congress 0.6%
Ruby Corby-O'Neill For Congress 14.8%
Comer For Congress 1.8%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Hohman For Congress $43,801 7 2022
Mark McCloskey For Missouri $51,518 6 2022
Cloud For Congress $105,567 5 2018
Fight For Mississippi Pac $28,288 5 2022
Brad Namdar For Congress $3,025 2 2022
Laurie Buckhout For Congress $1,569 1 2024
Ruby Corby-O'Neill For Congress $41,508 1 2018
Comer For Congress $5,099 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Fulfillment Solutions Inc 3 170.1x
Pac Management Services Llc 3 68.3x
Direct Mail Processors 3 56.3x
Middletown Valley Bank 3 52.4x
Hsp Direct Llc 3 51.4x
Nova List 3 49.7x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.