elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Google G-Suite

vendor

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

CONSULT,ADVERTISE,OVERHEAD,OTHER,001,FEES

9 committees paid them122 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
21.7%
top client · Nicole For New York
78.3%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Nicole For New York 21.7%
Dan Goldman For New York 50.0%
Southpaw Pac 6.6%
George Phillips For Congress 4.4%
Schmitt For Congress 4.7%
Georgians For Latham, Inc. 3.6%
Dan Goldman For New York 9.0%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Nicole For New York $3,088 37 2024
Dan Goldman For New York $7,117 18 2024
Southpaw Pac $939 16 2022
George Phillips For Congress $624 12 2020
Schmitt For Congress $674 9 2022
Georgians For Latham, Inc. $512 4 2022
Dan Goldman For New York $1,283 3 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Csc Capital 3 729.0x
Usps 3 113.6x
Paychex 3 34.2x
Constant Contact 3 28.0x
Amazon.Com 3 25.8x
Winred Technical Services 3 23.9x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.