elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Allsups

vendor

HOBBS, NM

UNKNOWN,001,002,003

23 committees paid them338 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2006,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
24.9%
top client · Teresa For All
65.5%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Teresa For All 24.9%
Virdell For Congress 31.0%
Teresa For All 9.6%
Sharon For Nm 20.5%
Anise For Congress Inc 11.1%
Fair Game Pac 2.9%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Teresa For All $405 9 2022
Virdell For Congress $504 8 2020
Teresa For All $157 5 2020
Sharon For Nm $334 5 2024
Anise For Congress Inc $181 3 2020
Fair Game Pac $46 1 2020

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Amazon 3 10.5x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.