elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Network For Good

vendor

WASHINGTON, DC

DONATIONS,012,FUNDRAISE,001,007,EVENT

27 committees paid them37 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
2.3%
7.6%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Jamie Raskin For Congress 2.3%
Kuster For Congress, Inc 1.6%
Barbara Lee For Congress 3.8%
Illinois Tenth Congressional District Democrats 0.8%
Barbara Lee For Congress -3.8%
Laura For Kansas 3.8%
Jon Hoadley For Congress 3.9%
Garbarino For Congress 37.7%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Jamie Raskin For Congress $154 1 2018
Kuster For Congress, Inc $103 1 2024
Barbara Lee For Congress $250 1 2020
Illinois Tenth Congressional District Democrats $50 1 2020
Barbara Lee For Congress $-250 1 2024
Laura For Kansas $250 1 2022
Jon Hoadley For Congress $258 1 2020
Garbarino For Congress $2,500 1 2024
Cori Bush For Congress $424 1 2022
Welch For Vermont $2,900 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Ama 3 180.1x
Booking.Com 3 161.2x
Shopify 4 71.6x
At&T 6 52.6x
Uber Technologies 3 49.8x
Doordash 3 39.8x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.