elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Union League Of Philadelphia

vendor

PHILADELPHIA, PA

000,UNKNOWN,001,007,002,003

65 committees paid them291 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2006,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
25.6%
top client · Team McCormick
29.5%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Team McCormick 25.6%
Marino For Congress 2.1%
Dwight Evans For Congress 1.8%
Republican Federal Committee Of Pennsylvania 5.3%
Pennsylvania Congressional Renewal 2022 3.1%
Toomey Prosperity Fund 2.8%
Red White Lou Fund 59.4%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Team McCormick $21,889 2 2024
Marino For Congress $1,835 1 2018
Dwight Evans For Congress $1,512 1 2018
Republican Federal Committee Of Pennsylvania $4,500 1 2024
Pennsylvania Congressional Renewal 2022 $2,614 1 2022
Toomey Prosperity Fund $2,423 1 2018
Red White Lou Fund $50,800 1 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Duquesne Club 3 212.6x
Mdi Imaging & Mail 3 30.7x
Huckaby Davis Lisker 3 13.6x
Anedot 5 5.0x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.