elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Capitol Response, Llc

vendor

ATLANTA, GA

001

5 committees paid them62 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2020,2018,2016

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
71.2%
92.8%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Captured
one client is a majority of this vendor's revenue
Drew Ferguson For Congress Inc. 71.2%
Point Pac, Inc. 5.3%
Made In America Pac, Inc. 16.2%
Rwa Fund, Inc. 2.6%
Made In America Pac, Inc. 3.7%
Committee To Elect Lutin For Congress 1.0%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Drew Ferguson For Congress Inc. $48,302 26 2018
Point Pac, Inc. $3,608 10 2018
Made In America Pac, Inc. $11,000 6 2020
Rwa Fund, Inc. $1,750 4 2018
Made In America Pac, Inc. $2,500 4 2022
Committee To Elect Lutin For Congress $650 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Anedot 3 5.4x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.