elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Grp Buying Llc

vendor

COLUMBUS, OH

004

7 committees paid them32 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2018

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
20.9%
70.9%
top 3 clients
99.4%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Bryan Smith For Idaho Inc. 20.9%
Conservative Alliance Pac 24.2%
Committee For Mike Marsicano 25.8%
Gopac Election Fund 8.1%
Kentucky Tomorrow, Inc. 10.5%
Defend Us Pac 1.9%
Gopac Election Fund 6.2%
Outsider Pac 0.2%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Bryan Smith For Idaho Inc. $440,280 13 2022
Conservative Alliance Pac $509,066 8 2018
Committee For Mike Marsicano $541,970 7 2022
Gopac Election Fund $170,544 4 2020
Kentucky Tomorrow, Inc. $220,600 4 2018
Defend Us Pac $40,000 2 2020
Gopac Election Fund $129,500 2 2018
Outsider Pac $4,200 1 2018
Team Pac $20,361 1 2022
Conservatives For Effective Government $15,000 1 2022
Sabatini For Congress $12,500 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Chain Bridge Bank 5 11.3x
Anedot 3 2.1x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.