ANNAPOLIS, MD
001
Active cycles: 2024,2022
Committees served / cycle
Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.
Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.
| Committee | Paid | Payments | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nine Pac | $13,238 | 69 | 2024 |
| John James For Michigan | $1,580 | 27 | 2024 |
| Nrcc | $75,474 | 14 | 2024 |
| Jim Nelson For Congress | $447 | 10 | 2024 |
| Vicky Hartzler For Senate | $168 | 3 | 2022 |
| Nine Pac | $144 | 1 | 2022 |
| Vicky Hartzler For Senate | $-4 | 1 | 2024 |
Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.
| Vendor | Shared committees | Lift |
|---|---|---|
| Onmessage Digital Fundraising Llc | 4 | 1296.1x |
| Campaign Data Group | 3 | 514.6x |
| Onmessage Inc | 4 | 402.2x |
| Believe Media Llc | 3 | 380.4x |
| Reach Right Digital Marketing, Llc | 3 | 291.6x |
| Hickory Data Llc | 3 | 218.7x |
Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.
Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.