elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Election Impact Group

vendor

OXFORD, MS

AR,001,005,006,002,101,003,UT,004

45 committees paid them351 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2006

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
30.9%
75.1%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Tim Aalders For Us Senate 30.9%
Diehl For Us Senate 13.3%
Sheriff Richard MacK For Congress Inc. 30.9%
Robert Deming For Congress 14.8%
Ron Eller For Congress 6.6%
Black Conservative Movement 1.9%
Andrew Badger For Congress 1.7%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Tim Aalders For Us Senate $37,005 21 2018
Diehl For Us Senate $15,904 13 2018
Sheriff Richard MacK For Congress Inc. $36,904 12 2018
Robert Deming For Congress $17,687 9 2020
Ron Eller For Congress $7,837 5 2022
Black Conservative Movement $2,280 1 2020
Andrew Badger For Congress $2,000 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Political Media 3 729.0x
Professional Data Services 3 21.0x
Anedot 3 3.8x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.