elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Corporate Press

vendor

LANHAM, MD

001,006,003,004

14 committees paid them58 payments

Active cycles: 2018,2016,2014,2012,2006

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
3.8%
top client · King For Congress
98.1%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
King For Congress 3.8%
Nrcc 74.3%
McSally For Congress 20.1%
North Carolina Republican Party 1.0%
Teapartyexpress.Org 0.8%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
King For Congress $6,463 4 2018
Nrcc $125,954 3 2018
McSally For Congress $34,014 2 2018
North Carolina Republican Party $1,750 1 2018
Teapartyexpress.Org $1,439 1 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Campaign Hq 4 418.7x
Image Direct 3 182.8x
Campaign Solutions 3 52.8x
Capitol Hill Club 3 25.9x
Stripe 3 17.8x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.