elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

League Of Conservation Voters Action Fund

vendor

WASHINGTON, DC

001,003

414 committees paid them3,152 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2006

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
97.3%
99.0%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Captured
one client is a majority of this vendor's revenue
Monica Tranel For Montana 97.3%
Angus King For U.S. Senate Campaign 0.7%
Jonathan Nez For Congress 1.0%
Dscc 1.0%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Monica Tranel For Montana $4,750 1 2024
Angus King For U.S. Senate Campaign $33 1 2018
Jonathan Nez For Congress $50 1 2024
Dscc $50 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Target Corporation 3 850.5x
Tiber Creek Group 3 204.1x
Numero Inc. 3 189.0x
Rwt Production Llc 4 138.9x
Numero Inc 3 127.6x
Dccc 3 121.5x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.