elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

T-Mobile

vendor

DALLAS, TX

CONSULT,ADVERTISE,DONATIONS,OVERHEAD,OTHER,UNKNOWN,001,POLLING,FOOD,FEES,101,ACCOUNT

130 committees paid them2,255 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2006,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
51.6%
86.9%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Captured
one client is a majority of this vendor's revenue
Pete Sessions For Congress 51.6%
Castor For Congress 10.7%
Sheila Jackson Lee For Congress 24.7%
Committee To Elect Mauro Garza For Us Congress 5.0%
Committee To Elect Mauro Garza For Us Congress 4.5%
Galveston County Republican Party 3.6%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Pete Sessions For Congress $5,513 20 2024
Castor For Congress $1,144 18 2018
Sheila Jackson Lee For Congress $2,639 9 2020
Committee To Elect Mauro Garza For Us Congress $530 4 2018
Committee To Elect Mauro Garza For Us Congress $480 3 2020
Galveston County Republican Party $388 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Home Depot 3 382.7x
Office Depot 3 134.6x
Anedot 3 5.4x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.