elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Partido Nuevo Progresista

vendor

SAN JUAN, PR

012,011,001,004

1 committees paid them7 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2020,2018,2016

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
32.0%
94.8%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
International Union Of Painters And Allied Trades Political Action Together Political Committee 32.0%
Walmart Inc. Pac For Responsible Government 30.9%
Squire Patton Boggs Political Action Committee (Squire Patton Boggs Pac) 32.0%
Deloitte Political Action Committee 5.2%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
International Union Of Painters And Allied Trades Political Action Together Political Committee $3,100 1 2024
Walmart Inc. Pac For Responsible Government $3,000 1 2024
Squire Patton Boggs Political Action Committee (Squire Patton Boggs Pac) $3,100 1 2024
Deloitte Political Action Committee $500 1 2020

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
House Democratic Campaign Committee 3 695.9x
Wall for Wisconsin 3 612.4x
Senate Democratic Campaign Committee 3 588.8x
Neighbors for Justin Bibb 3 527.9x
David Osborne for State Representative 3 463.9x
Alma for Arizona 3 325.7x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.