elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

San Antonio Republican Women

vendor

SAN ANTONIO, TX

ADVERTISE,GIFTS,DONATIONS,OVERHEAD,OTHER,001,FOOD,FEES,003,EVENT,004

25 committees paid them99 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2018,2016,2014

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
7.6%
top client · Isaac For Texas
33.1%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Isaac For Texas 7.6%
Tony Gonzales For Congress 17.4%
Texans For Lamar Smith 8.0%
Republican Party Of Bexar County 66.9%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Isaac For Texas $142 3 2018
Tony Gonzales For Congress $325 2 2022
Texans For Lamar Smith $150 1 2018
Republican Party Of Bexar County $1,250 1 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Alamo City Republican Women 3 3061.9x
Bexar County Republican Women 3 3061.9x
Anedot 3 6.7x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.