elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Cls Services

vendor

APPLETON, WI

001,006,003,004

14 committees paid them29 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
60.7%
top client · Leah For Senate
93.5%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Captured
one client is a majority of this vendor's revenue
Leah For Senate 60.7%
Tony Wied For Congress 25.7%
Stacey For Wisconsin 7.2%
The Great Task 3.1%
Jacque For Wisconsin 1.4%
Allies Of Purnima Nath 1.9%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Leah For Senate $55,865 3 2018
Tony Wied For Congress $23,657 3 2024
Stacey For Wisconsin $6,617 2 2024
The Great Task $2,884 1 2022
Jacque For Wisconsin $1,319 1 2024
Allies Of Purnima Nath $1,741 1 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Targeted Victory 3 30.4x
American Airlines 3 6.1x
Anedot 3 3.8x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.