elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Royal Performance Group

vendor

LISLE, IL

001,002,TRAVELIN

21 committees paid them207 payments

Active cycles: 2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
52.0%
top client · For Our Future
99.0%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Captured
one client is a majority of this vendor's revenue
For Our Future 52.0%
For Our Future 10.1%
Development Now For Chicago 36.9%
Ted Lieu For Congress 1.0%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
For Our Future $64,893 13 2018
For Our Future $12,569 2 2024
Development Now For Chicago $46,075 2 2024
Ted Lieu For Congress $1,214 1 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Bright House Networks 3 1531.0x
Scale To Win 3 27.3x
Ngp Van, Inc. 3 14.8x
Facebook 3 7.6x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.