elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Go Green Valet

vendor

TEMPE, AZ

001

8 committees paid them14 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2016

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
14.7%
top client · Norton For Congress
64.2%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Norton For Congress 14.7%
McSally Victory Committe 18.1%
Masters Victory Committee 31.4%
Tanya For Arizona 17.7%
Ciscomani For Congress 9.8%
Abe For Arizona 8.4%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Norton For Congress $790 2 2022
McSally Victory Committe $975 2 2020
Masters Victory Committee $1,690 2 2022
Tanya For Arizona $950 1 2022
Ciscomani For Congress $525 1 2022
Abe For Arizona $450 1 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Targeted Victory 3 35.4x
Amazon 3 8.8x
Anedot 3 4.5x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.