elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Print Runner

vendor

VAN NUYS, CA

PRINTING,ADVERTISE,OVERHEAD,001,006,003,004

39 committees paid them63 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
5.1%
top client · Virdell For Congress
15.4%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Virdell For Congress 5.1%
Campaign Committee Of Joseph Brumbles 3.3%
Matlock For Congress 7.1%
D.D. Adams For Congress 2.7%
Rhea For Republican Renewal 2.0%
Mark Lamb For Senate 5.5%
Culp For Congress 6.0%
David Scott For Congress 67.7%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Virdell For Congress $551 2 2020
Campaign Committee Of Joseph Brumbles $354 1 2018
Matlock For Congress $765 1 2018
D.D. Adams For Congress $294 1 2018
Rhea For Republican Renewal $217 1 2018
Mark Lamb For Senate $597 1 2024
Culp For Congress $650 1 2022
David Scott For Congress $7,322 1 2022
Yu For Senate $73 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Amazon 4 7.0x
Facebook 5 6.3x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.