SAN MATEO, CA
001
Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020
Committees served / cycle
Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.
Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.
| Committee | Paid | Payments | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chc Bold Pac | $84,718 | 77 | 2024 |
| No Dem Left Behind Pac | $24,802 | 75 | 2024 |
| Chc Bold Pac | $68,232 | 64 | 2022 |
| Tech For Campaigns | $281,642 | 54 | 2024 |
| Development Now For Chicago | $29,676 | 36 | 2024 |
| Common Power | $47,294 | 25 | 2020 |
| No Dem Left Behind Pac | $7,209 | 16 | 2022 |
| Tech For Campaigns | $82,306 | 6 | 2022 |
Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.
| Vendor | Shared committees | Lift |
|---|---|---|
| Dc Health Link | 3 | 312.4x |
| Wework | 3 | 301.7x |
| American Express | 5 | 33.0x |
| Public Policy Polling | 3 | 29.8x |
| Gusto | 6 | 27.1x |
| Zoom | 4 | 25.8x |
Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.
Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.