elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Google Suites

vendor

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

OVERHEAD,OTHER,001,006,004

12 committees paid them198 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
48.8%
top client · The Lincoln Project
70.3%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
The Lincoln Project 48.8%
Voterpac 12.3%
Baccam For Iowa 9.3%
Rising Electorate Pac 7.4%
Voterpac 8.0%
Rising Electorate Pac 3.8%
Committee To Elect Nasser Beydoun 8.7%
Holness For Congress 0.6%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
The Lincoln Project $8,263 23 2022
Voterpac $2,080 16 2022
Baccam For Iowa $1,576 13 2024
Rising Electorate Pac $1,260 12 2020
Voterpac $1,363 12 2024
Rising Electorate Pac $642 8 2022
Committee To Elect Nasser Beydoun $1,479 6 2024
Holness For Congress $99 4 2022
Defeat By Tweet $144 3 2022
Christian Collins For Congress $43 2 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Dropbox 3 41.0x
Capitol Compliance Associates 3 30.9x
Amazon.Com 4 26.8x
Harland Clarke 3 23.1x
Hotels.Com 3 16.2x
Zoom 3 15.1x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.