elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Sage Advisory Group Llc

vendor

SPRINGFIELD, VA

001

6 committees paid them49 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
15.3%
top client · Frogman Pac
81.1%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Frogman Pac 15.3%
Anna Cheng Kramer For Congress 13.4%
Georgians For Latham, Inc. 52.3%
The 1776 Project Pac 6.2%
Georgians For Latham, Inc. 6.1%
Common Sense Anne Arundel 0.6%
Virginia In Milwaukee 2024 3.5%
Frogman Pac 1.9%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Frogman Pac $12,429 19 2024
Anna Cheng Kramer For Congress $10,861 13 2024
Georgians For Latham, Inc. $42,380 10 2022
The 1776 Project Pac $5,009 3 2024
Georgians For Latham, Inc. $4,935 2 2024
Common Sense Anne Arundel $525 1 2022
Virginia In Milwaukee 2024 $2,820 1 2024
Frogman Pac $1,500 1 2022
Common Sense Anne Arundel $554 1 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Winred Technical Services 3 18.6x
Cmdi 3 10.0x
Anedot 5 5.0x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.