elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Unite Here Local 100

vendor

NEW YORK, NY

001

4 committees paid them50 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
5.9%
top client · Workers Vote
62.8%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Workers Vote 5.9%
Worker Power Pac 12.7%
Workers Vote 44.2%
Workers Vote 33.8%
Unite Here Pac 3.3%
Unite Here Tip Campaign Committee 0.0%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Workers Vote $32,603 31 2024
Worker Power Pac $69,470 28 2024
Workers Vote $242,850 16 2022
Workers Vote $185,541 7 2020
Unite Here Pac $18,164 5 2020
Unite Here Tip Campaign Committee $268 1 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Unite Here Local 274 4 5103.2x
Local 23 Unite Here 3 5103.2x
Unite Here Local 7 3 5103.2x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.