elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Ngp Software

vendor

PITTSBURGH, PA

001,003,004

4 committees paid them31 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2020,2018

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
43.7%
55.3%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Garrick McFadden For Congress 43.7%
Maple Pac 6.5%
Maple Pac 5.2%
Welch For Vermont 16.9%
Welch For Congress 25.2%
Maple Pac 2.6%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Garrick McFadden For Congress $10,145 13 2018
Maple Pac $1,500 5 2022
Maple Pac $1,200 4 2020
Welch For Vermont $3,925 4 2022
Welch For Congress $5,850 3 2018
Maple Pac $600 2 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Peter Welch 3 5103.2x
Chase Freedom 3 5103.2x
Fidelity Credit Cards 3 5103.2x
First Step Print Shop 3 1913.7x
Adp 3 850.5x
Kieloch Consulting 3 510.3x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.