SACRAMENTO, CA
WA,CA,OVERHEAD,UNKNOWN,17,001,007,OFC,006,002,101,MI,003,004
Active cycles: 2026,2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2006,2004
Committees served / cycle
Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.
Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.
Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.
| Vendor | Shared committees | Lift |
|---|---|---|
| Social Good Fund | 4 | 653.2x |
| Madera County Elections | 3 | 408.3x |
| At&T Mobility | 3 | 349.9x |
| Peerless Print & Graphics | 3 | 306.2x |
| Invictus Campaign Strategies | 3 | 188.4x |
| Pg&E | 5 | 177.5x |
Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.
Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.