elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Sutton & Smart Campaigns, Llc

vendor

PHOENIX, AZ

001,003

5 committees paid them16 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
61.8%
84.1%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Captured
one client is a majority of this vendor's revenue
Jonathan Nez For Congress 61.8%
Aguilar 4 Congress 9.5%
Zerqa Abid For Congress 12.8%
Joseph C. Rocha For Congress 9.1%
Andrei For Arizona 6.8%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Jonathan Nez For Congress $67,930 10 2024
Aguilar 4 Congress $10,444 2 2024
Zerqa Abid For Congress $14,085 2 2024
Joseph C. Rocha For Congress $10,000 1 2022
Andrei For Arizona $7,500 1 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Grassroots Analytics, Inc. 3 78.8x
Switchboard Public Benefit Corp 4 46.1x
Spiros Consulting 3 39.4x
Numero 3 34.4x
Public Policy Polling 3 29.8x
Gusto 3 13.6x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.