elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Tormima Llc

vendor

NEW YORK, NY

001

5 committees paid them22 payments

Active cycles: 2020,2018

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
26.7%
top client · Forward Not Back
79.6%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Forward Not Back 26.7%
United Together 24.4%
With Honor Fund, Inc. 28.5%
Conor Lamb For Senate 15.5%
United For Progress, Inc. 0.0%
With Honor Fund, Inc. 4.9%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Forward Not Back $167,444 7 2018
United Together $153,036 5 2018
With Honor Fund, Inc. $178,256 4 2018
Conor Lamb For Senate $96,831 4 2018
United For Progress, Inc. $212 1 2018
With Honor Fund, Inc. $30,771 1 2020

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Mullins Pc 3 2449.6x
Scr Strategies 3 1531.0x
Ct Corporation 3 127.6x
Bulldog Compliance 3 101.2x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.