WASHINGTON, DC
Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018
Committees served / cycle
Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.
Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.
| Committee | Paid | Payments | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stabenow For Us Senate | $161,361 | 32 | 2022 |
| Great Lakes Pac | $187,500 | 25 | 2022 |
| Great Lakes Pac | $102,870 | 22 | 2024 |
| Stabenow For Us Senate | $47,842 | 18 | 2020 |
| Michigan Victory Fund | $17,000 | 17 | 2024 |
| Stabenow For Us Senate | $99,463 | 11 | 2018 |
| Stabenow For Us Senate | $6,000 | 1 | 2024 |
Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.
| Vendor | Shared committees | Lift |
|---|---|---|
| Ngp Software Inc | 3 | 4082.6x |
| First Financial Bank | 3 | 2268.1x |
| Ngp Van, Inc | 3 | 196.3x |
| Harland Clarke | 3 | 69.2x |
| Elias Law Group | 3 | 45.9x |
Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.
Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.