elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Fp1

vendor

ARLINGTON, VA

001,006,004

5 committees paid them99 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
84.0%
top client · Jane Timken For Ohio
87.4%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Captured
one client is a majority of this vendor's revenue
Jane Timken For Ohio 84.0%
Zay For Congress 1.6%
Scott Gryder For Congress 1.9%
Dan Crenshaw For Congress 1.6%
Harwell For Congress 11.0%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Jane Timken For Ohio $4,752,251 44 2022
Zay For Congress $90,297 29 2024
Scott Gryder For Congress $106,286 10 2022
Dan Crenshaw For Congress $90,073 8 2020
Harwell For Congress $621,566 8 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Aristotle International, Inc. 3 61.2x
Mailchimp 3 14.4x
Winred Technical Services Llc 3 13.9x
Facebook 3 7.6x
Anedot 3 5.4x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.