MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
ADVERTISE,OVERHEAD,OTHER,UNKNOWN,001,007,002,FEES,003,004
Active cycles: 2026,2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2006,2004
Committees served / cycle
Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.
Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.
Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.
| Vendor | Shared committees | Lift |
|---|---|---|
| Mailing Technical Services, Inc. | 3 | 329.2x |
| Billings Times | 3 | 164.6x |
| Political Financial Management Llc | 3 | 131.7x |
| Uber Conference | 3 | 123.5x |
| Morgan, Meredith & Associates | 3 | 98.8x |
| Roberts Public Strategies | 3 | 98.8x |
Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.
Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.