elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Martha'S Vineyard

vendor

GRAND RAPIDS, MI

001,007,003

9 committees paid them22 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2016,2014,2012,2010,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
24.7%
84.6%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Justin Amash For Senate 24.7%
Huizenga For Congress 50.2%
John James For Senate, Inc. 9.7%
Scholten For Congress 15.4%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Justin Amash For Senate $556 1 2024
Huizenga For Congress $1,129 1 2024
John James For Senate, Inc. $218 1 2020
Scholten For Congress $346 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Martha'S Catering 3 3061.9x
Campaign Resource Group Llc 4 1020.6x
Sam'S Club 3 644.6x
Usps 3 306.2x
We The Pizza 3 101.2x
American Express 3 31.6x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.