SAN FRANCISCO, CA
OVERHEAD,001
Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020
Committees served / cycle
Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.
Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.
| Committee | Paid | Payments | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hodlpac | $531 | 9 | 2022 |
| Jamie Raskin For Congress | $602 | 7 | 2024 |
| The Good Party | $200 | 4 | 2022 |
| Joe Morelle For Congress | $260 | 4 | 2024 |
| Isemann For New Jersey | $297 | 3 | 2022 |
Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.
| Vendor | Shared committees | Lift |
|---|---|---|
| Adobe | 3 | 41.3x |
| Jetblue | 3 | 35.9x |
| Zoom | 4 | 25.8x |
| Mailchimp | 3 | 10.3x |
| Intuit | 3 | 9.9x |
| 4 | 8.6x |
Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.
Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.