elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Blackbaud, Inc.

vendor

DANIEL ISLAND, SC

4 committees paid them300 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2020,2018,2016,2006

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
19.9%
top client · Lcv Victory Fund
59.3%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Lcv Victory Fund 19.9%
League Of Conservation Voters Action Fund 26.5%
Humane World Action Fund Political Action Committee 12.9%
Humane World Action Fund Political Action Committee 12.7%
Humane World Action Fund Political Action Committee 6.4%
Roger Williams For U S Congress Committee 21.6%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Lcv Victory Fund $7,154 63 2018
League Of Conservation Voters Action Fund $9,489 62 2018
Humane World Action Fund Political Action Committee $4,619 14 2018
Humane World Action Fund Political Action Committee $4,568 11 2020
Humane World Action Fund Political Action Committee $2,290 10 2022
Roger Williams For U S Congress Committee $7,750 1 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Usps 3 28.7x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.