elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Google, Inc.

vendor

WASHINGTON, DC

001,003

10 committees paid them231 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
59.7%
top client · Peters For Michigan
74.1%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Captured
one client is a majority of this vendor's revenue
Peters For Michigan 59.7%
Fostering Progress Pac 9.1%
New Democrat Coalition Action Fund 5.3%
Lofgren For Congress 2.2%
New Democrat Coalition Action Fund 2.0%
Peters For Michigan 5.0%
Lofgren For Congress 17.5%
New Democrat Coalition Action Fund -0.7%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Peters For Michigan $6,891 23 2024
Fostering Progress Pac $1,045 20 2024
New Democrat Coalition Action Fund $617 7 2024
Lofgren For Congress $252 3 2024
New Democrat Coalition Action Fund $229 3 2022
Peters For Michigan $572 2 2022
Lofgren For Congress $2,017 2 2018
New Democrat Coalition Action Fund $-77 1 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Skdknickerbocker Llc 3 329.2x
Scotch Digital 3 255.2x
Uber Technologies 3 83.0x
Capitol Compliance Associates 3 46.4x
Hotels.Com 3 24.2x
Amtrak 4 23.3x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.