elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

United States Post Office

vendor

SUGAR LAND, TX

PRINTING,DONATIONS,UNKNOWN,001,006,ACCOUNT,CONSULT,LEGAL,ADVERTISE,GIFTS,OVERHEAD,OTHER,FUNDRAISE,FEES,003,EVENT,004

359 committees paid them2,593 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
76.2%
88.3%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Captured
one client is a majority of this vendor's revenue
McFadden For Congress Committee 76.2%
Laura Jones For Congress 8.2%
Thornberry For Congress Committee 3.8%
Jane Hope Hamilton For Congress 4.9%
Etwop For Congress 5.9%
Shipp For Congress 0.9%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
McFadden For Congress Committee $4,273 21 2018
Laura Jones For Congress $462 4 2024
Thornberry For Congress Committee $212 1 2022
Jane Hope Hamilton For Congress $275 1 2022
Etwop For Congress $332 1 2024
Shipp For Congress $50 1 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Mailchimp 3 10.3x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.