elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Gates, Kent

vendor

FORT WORTH, TX

001

5 committees paid them24 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
2.1%
89.1%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Capito For West Virginia 2.1%
Capito For West Virginia 3.5%
Capito For West Virginia 83.4%
Texans For Texas 1.2%
Brian Jack For Congress 0.8%
Wagle For Kansas 6.8%
Foster For Kansas 2.1%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Capito For West Virginia $961 6 2024
Capito For West Virginia $1,596 6 2022
Capito For West Virginia $37,691 5 2020
Texans For Texas $558 2 2018
Brian Jack For Congress $374 1 2024
Wagle For Kansas $3,056 1 2020
Foster For Kansas $949 1 2020

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Brabendercox 3 4082.6x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.