elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Aph Consulting

vendor

LOS ANGELES, CA

001

8 committees paid them28 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
51.9%
top client · Amish For Arizona
72.9%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Captured
one client is a majority of this vendor's revenue
Amish For Arizona 51.9%
Mary Peltola For Alaska 18.2%
Nicole Lopez For Congress 2.9%
Steve Dunwoody For Congress 3.8%
Sandoval For Colorado 13.6%
Daniel Lee For Congress 4.5%
Charlie Kim In Us Congress 4.5%
Committee To Elect William M Summerville To Congress 0.5%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Amish For Arizona $34,200 12 2024
Mary Peltola For Alaska $12,000 3 2022
Nicole Lopez For Congress $1,900 3 2024
Steve Dunwoody For Congress $2,500 2 2024
Sandoval For Colorado $9,000 2 2022
Daniel Lee For Congress $3,000 2 2022
Charlie Kim In Us Congress $3,000 1 2024
Committee To Elect William M Summerville To Congress $356 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Phoneburner 3 39.1x
Scale To Win 5 28.5x
Uber 3 10.4x
Google 4 7.5x
Ngp Van 3 6.7x
Actblue 3 6.7x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.