SACRAMENTO, CA
000,001,007,003,004
Active cycles: 2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010
Committees served / cycle
Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.
Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.
| Committee | Paid | Payments | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protect The House | $2,134 | 2 | 2018 |
| Take Back The House California 2020 | $741 | 1 | 2020 |
| California Victory 2018 | $668 | 1 | 2018 |
| Andrew Grant For Congress | $1,036 | 1 | 2018 |
Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.
| Vendor | Shared committees | Lift |
|---|---|---|
| Sierra Hills Consulting | 3 | 644.6x |
| Croce, Renee | 3 | 612.4x |
| Golden State Strategy Group | 3 | 471.1x |
| Campaign Financial Services | 3 | 63.5x |
| Targeted Victory | 3 | 42.5x |
Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.
Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.