elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Ameren Illinois

vendor

CHICAGO, IL

001

7 committees paid them50 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2018,2016,2014

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
43.8%
top client · Lahood For Congress
79.5%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Lahood For Congress 43.8%
Congressional Leadership Fund 21.0%
Friends Of Jonathan Ebel 14.8%
David Gill For Congress 8.0%
Lahood For Congress 12.5%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Lahood For Congress $4,384 14 2024
Congressional Leadership Fund $2,100 13 2018
Friends Of Jonathan Ebel $1,478 5 2018
David Gill For Congress $799 4 2018
Lahood For Congress $1,253 3 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Stripe 3 14.8x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.