elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Absolute Resource Development

vendor

TULSA, OK

001,002,003

9 committees paid them109 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2016

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
12.5%
top client · Mullin For America
38.1%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Mullin For America 12.5%
Mullin Victory Fund 10.0%
Mullin For America 15.7%
Mullin Victory Fund 20.2%
Turnaround Team Pac 6.9%
Restoring Oklahoman Values 2.7%
David Hill For Oklahoma, Inc. 10.2%
Turnaround Team Pac 2.5%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Mullin For America $57,329 15 2022
Mullin Victory Fund $45,677 14 2020
Mullin For America $71,963 14 2020
Mullin Victory Fund $92,850 13 2022
Turnaround Team Pac $31,822 7 2024
Restoring Oklahoman Values $12,474 5 2022
David Hill For Oklahoma, Inc. $46,630 5 2020
Turnaround Team Pac $11,535 4 2022
Trump 47 Committee, Inc. $41,629 4 2024
Restoring Oklahoman Values $46,840 4 2020

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Intuit 3 11.6x
Anedot 4 6.0x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.