elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

O-Ku

vendor

WASHINGTON, DC

001,003

9 committees paid them13 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
11.4%
78.5%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Jimmy Gomez For Congress 11.4%
Gallego For Arizona 52.0%
Gallego For Arizona 15.1%
Fry For Congress 7.1%
Nathaniel Moran For Congress 7.4%
Max Miller For Congress 6.9%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Jimmy Gomez For Congress $512 2 2024
Gallego For Arizona $2,342 1 2020
Gallego For Arizona $681 1 2022
Fry For Congress $320 1 2024
Nathaniel Moran For Congress $335 1 2024
Max Miller For Congress $312 1 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Republic Cantina 3 850.5x
Le Diplomate 3 450.3x
Chipotle 3 156.2x
Nationals Park 3 125.5x
Trattoria Alberto 3 99.4x
Santa Rosa Taqueria 3 96.9x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.